Evaluation Of Public Housing

Evaluation Of Public Housing

Abstract

Governments each over the world are taking way to address the problem of furnishing acceptable and affordable casing to their people. Ogun State Government in Southwest Nigeria isn’t left out in this drive, and therefore initiated an intertwined public casing programme in 2003 with the supposition that the use of different strategies by different associations will affect in the provision of acceptable casing and bettered quality of life for different orders of people in the State. In view of the fact that the validity of this supposition has not been formally examined, this exploration thus aimed at assessing public casing in Ogun State, Nigeria, with a view to examining the extent to which the different casing delivery strategies have handed acceptable and satisfactory casing and told the quality of life of residers of public casing in the State.

Survey and qualitative exploration strategies as well as commensurate and intentional slice

ways were used in opting repliers. Primary data was attained through the

administration of questionnaire to 90 deliberately named staff members, and oral interviews with four elderly operation staff in four crucial public casing agencies. In addition, questionnaire and observation schedule were used in carrying data from 517 casing units named from four different casing delivery strategies grounded on the proportion of their circumstance in nine recently constructed public casing estates. The quantitative data was analysed using frequentness, probabilities, cross tabulations, discriminant, top element and categorical retrogression analyses; while the qualitative data was analysed using content analysis. Findings show that the four public casing agencies tried were rated as having acceptable organizational capacity in public casing provision. still, casing handed by the agencies was rated affordable, shy and not satisfactory by the residers. Although, public casing estates tried demanded introductory socio- profitable structure, maturity of the repliers felt satisfied with life in their current places. The study set up significant differences in socio- profitable characteristics of residers and situations of casing acceptability and satisfaction across the four strategies. Whereas the Core casing strategy handed casing for low- income earners and was rated as having handed the most acceptable and satisfactory casing, the Turnkey and Public- Private Partnership( PPP) strategies handed the least acceptable and satisfactory casing independently for middle- income earners. The Shell strategy which handed casing for high- income class had the loftiest proportion of those who felt satisfied with life. Satisfaction with operation of casing estates and casing unit attributes among other attributes discerned between the residers who were satisfied with life and those who were not. Housing unit attributes were rated the most acceptable and satisfactory while socio- profitable structure and neighbourhood installations were rated the least acceptable and least satisfactory casing attributes.

Findings also show that casing delivery strategies, fresh space demand in the casing

units, organizational capacity as well as age, income and term status of repliers among others were significant predicators of casing acceptability and domestic satisfaction in the study area. Domestic satisfaction, term status, casing acceptability, casing delivery strategies, length of occupancy, income and age of repliers were factors that told satisfaction with life in the casing estates. Although findings of the study are harmonious with the findings of previous exploration; the categorical retrogression analysis( R2

= 1.000, F = 718909256; P = 0.000) still shows that acceptable casing( Beta = 1.000, F = 528886811; P = 0.000) was the strongest predictor of, and nearly related to, domestic satisfaction; and that casing acceptability and domestic satisfaction have significant influence on satisfaction with life. The findings indicate that the different casing delivery strategies used in public casing perform else in terms of residents†™ perceived acceptability and satisfaction; the situations of casing acceptability and satisfaction as well as quality of life in public casing can be enhanced through acceptable provision and conservation of introductory casing structure and neighbourhood installations; casing acceptability and satisfaction can be used as synonymous conception in the evaluation of jackets; and the underpinning supposition in public casing in Ogun State is valid.

Table Of Contents

Title runner——————- i

fidelity————————– ii

instrument———————— iii

fidelity————————– iv

Acknowledgement——————– v

Abstract———————- vi

Chapter 1 preface

Background of Study—————- 1

Statement of the Problem——————– 3

Aim of Study—————– 6

objects of Study——————- 6

defense——————- 6

compass of Study————– 8

Summary——————— 8

Chapter 2 THE environment OF STUDY————— 10

preface—————— 10

Basic Information on the study area———- 10

position and Size of Ogun State————– 10

executive Setting—————- 12

Demographics and Socio- profitable Characteristics of Ogun State———- 12

Public Housing in Ogun State—————- 14

Public Housing in Ogun State literal Perspective——— 14

The 2003 Ogun State Housing Policy———- 16

The Public Housing Programme in Ogun State and its objects—- 18

casing Delivery Strategies in the Public Housing Programme—— 18

i) Government backed Core Housing Strategy——– 19

ii) Turnkey Housing Delivery Strategy—————- 21

iii) Public-Private Partnership Housing Delivery Strategy—- 24

iv) Shell Stage Housing Delivery Strategy———– 26

Public Housing Agencies in Ogun State———— 28

Ogun State Housing Corporation————– 29

Ogun State Property and Investment Corporation———— 30

Gateway City Development Company Limited—— 32

Ogun State Ministry of Housing————- 33

Summary———————– 35

Chapter 3 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE————— 36

. preface——————- 36

Evaluation Research—————- 39

Programme proposition in Evaluation of Social Programmes———— 40

Studies in Public Housing—————— 43

Evaluation of Public Housing———— 46

confines of Evaluation of Public Housing——- 47

situations of Evaluation of public casing———– 48

Approaches to Evaluation of Public Housing———————- 50

Post residency Evaluations—————– 51

Satisfaction Studies———— 55

Evaluation of Quality—————– 60

Evaluation of Housing Adequacy———— 66

i) Decent casing——————– 69

ii) Safe Housing————- 70

iii) Healthy casing—————— 71

iv) Accessible casing—————– 74

v) Affordable casing—————- 74

styles of assessing Public Housing Schemes——— 76

Factors impacting the Evaluation of Public Housing————- 78

. 0 casing and Quality of Life—————- 80

Summary———————– 83

Chapter 4 Abstract frame—————— 85

preface—————- 85

Programme Theory and Abstract Approaches to Evaluation———– 86

The Abstract Framework of the Study———— 88

Summary———————- 89

Chapter 5 exploration METHODOLOGY————- 91

preface——————– 91

Research Strategy——————– 91

Sample Frame of casing Units and Public Housing Organisations—- 92

slice ways————— 92

Sample Size of casing Units and Staff Members of Organisations—— 92

Design of Data Collection Instruments————– 94

Data Collection and Data Treatment—————- 95

ideal 1——————— 95

ideal 2——————– 97

ideal 3——————— 98

ideal 4——————- 98

ideal 5——————- 100

. Data Processing———————- 102

. trustability and Validity Tests————— 103

Summary———————– 104

Chapter 6 THE ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY OF PUBLIC HOUSING

AGENCIES———————- 106

preface—————– 106

Socio- profitable Characteristics of the Repliers( Staff)—— 106

Organizational Characteristics of the Public Housing Agencies———- 110

Organizational Capacity of the Public Housing Agencies——— 118

Individual Acceptability Scores on Overall Organizational Capacity 119

Contributing Factors to Overall Organisational Capacity—- 119

Overall Acceptability of operation element————– 121

Overall Acceptability of Resource element———– 122

. Acceptability of Organisational Capacity of the Different Associations———— 123

Contributing Attributes to Acceptability of organizational Capacity of the

different Associations————————- 124

Contributing Attributes to Adequacy of Management Capacity across the

Organisations————— 125

Comparison of Organizational Capacity across the Agencies—– 127

Summary———————– 129

Chapter 7 CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSING handed in THE PUBLIC

HOUSING AGENCIES—————— 131

preface—————- 131

Overall casing Attributes————————- 131

fresh Conditions in the casing Units——- 133

casing Characteristics across the different Delivery Strategies 134

casing Unit Attributes—————— 134

casing Services and structure————– 140

casing Estate Characteristics and Neighbourhood installations– 143

relative Analysis of casing Characteristics in the four Delivery

Strategies——————– 146

Summary——————– 147

Chapter 8 SOCIAL AND profitable CHARACTERISTICS OF residers OF

PUBLIC casing ESTATES—————— 149

preface—————– 149

Socio- profitable Characteristics of the Repliers in all the casing Units– 149

Socio- profitable Characteristics of residers across different casing

Delivery Strategies————- 153

Summary———————– 160

Chapter 9 ASSESSMENT OF THE Acceptability OF PUBLIC HOUSING——- 161

. preface—————— 161

Overall casing Acceptability—————- 161

Contributing Attributes to Overall casing Acceptability—- 162

Acceptability of Housingsub-Components————– 163

i) Acceptability of Housing Unit Attributes————– 163

ii) Acceptability of Housing Services and structure——– 165

iii) Acceptability of Neighbourhood installations———– 166

iv) Acceptability of operation of installations in the Housing Estates– 166

casing Acceptability across the different Delivery Strategies——– 168

Contributing Attributes to Housing Adequacy across the different Strategies-

———————— 169

Acceptability Index Housingsub-Components——— 173

Variation in casing Acceptability————– 176

Factors impacting Overall casing Acceptability——- 177

confines of Evaluation of Overall casing Acceptability————- 179

confines of Evaluation of Housing Adequacy across the different Strategies

————————– 180

i) The Core Housing Strategy———– 180

ii) The Turnkey Housing Delivery Strategy————- 182

iii) PPP Housing Delivery Strategy————– 183

iv) The Shell Housing Delivery Strategy—————- 185

Comparison of confines of casing Acceptability Evaluation across the

Different Strategies———— 187

Summary——————- 189

Chapter 10 RESIDENTIAL SATISFACTION IN PUBLIC HOUSING———– 192

preface————— 192

Evaluation of Domestic Satisfaction———– 192

Overall Domestic Satisfaction———— 193

donation of Housing Attributes to Overall Domestic Satisfaction

————— 194

Satisfaction with HousingSub-Components—— 195

i) Satisfaction with Housing Unit Attributes————– 196

ii) Satisfaction with Housing Services———— 197

iii) Satisfaction with position of Neighbourhood installations——- 197

iv) Satisfaction with Socio- profitable terrain of casing Estates

——————- 198

v) Satisfaction with operation of Housing Estates——– 199

Domestic Satisfaction across the different casing Delivery Strategies– 201

donation of Housing Attributes to Domestic Satisfaction across the

Delivery Strategies——————– 202

Satisfaction with Housingsub-Components in all the Strategies—- 209

Satisfaction with Housingsub-components across the Different Strategies

—————– 211

Variation in Satisfaction with casingsub-components—— 214

Variation in Satisfaction across Socio- profitable characteristics of

Repliers———————- 214

Factors affecting Domestic Satisfaction in all the casing Estates——- 215

confines of Evaluation of Domestic Satisfaction in all the casing Estates†”—– 219

.1 confines of Evaluation of Domestic Satisfaction across the different

Strategies. ———————- 220

i) Core Housing Delivery Strategy———————- 220

ii) The Turnkey Housing Delivery Strategy———– 222

iii) The Public- Private Partnership Housing Delivery Strategy—— 224

iv) The Shell Housing Delivery Strategy————– 226

Comparison of confines of Domestic Satisfaction Evaluation across the

Different Strategies——————- 228

Summary——————– 230

Chapter 11 SATISFACTION WITH LIFE IN PUBLIC HOUSING †¦ †¦ †¦ †¦ †¦ †¦ †¦.233

Satisfaction with Life in all the Housing Estates——- 233

Satisfaction with Life across the different casing Delivery Strategies 234

Variation in Satisfaction with Life in all the Housing Estates———— 237

Factors Affecting Satisfaction with Life in all the casing Estates——- 237

Discriminants of Satisfaction with life in all the Housing Estates———- 243

. Summary——————— 243

Chapter 12 conflation, SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS——- 245

. preface——————– 245

. Overview of Research————— 245

Summary of Key Findings——————- 247

conflation of Key Issues Arising from the Study———— 250

Counteraccusations of Study Findings————- 257

Areas for farther Study————– 260

Concluding reflections—————— 261

REFERENCES——————— 262

supplements——————— 288

excursus 1 Ogun State in Context of Nigeria———- 288

excursus 2 bottom Plans of Core Housing Units———- 289

excursus 3 bottom Plan of Turnkey Housing Unit in OLokota Housing Estate——– 289

excursus 4 bottom Plan of Typical casing Unit in the PPP Strategy———– 290

excursus 5 bottom Plan of Typical casing Unit in the Shell Strategy———- 290

excursus 6 Variables for Assessing Organizational Capacity——— 291

excursus 7 casing Attributes——————- 292

excursus 8 casing Acceptability Variables—————- 293

excursus 9 Domestic Satisfaction and Satisfaction with Life Variables—— 295

excursus 10 Survey Questionnaire( Staff of Public Housing Agencies)——- 297

excursus 11 Interview companion——————— 300

Appendix12 casing Unit Survey Questionnaire—————- 301

excursus 13 Observation Schedule————– 307

excursus 14 trustability Test of Scale of Measurement of Staff Survey Questionnaire——– 309

excursus 15 trustability Test of Scale for Measurement for Housing Adequacy——- 310

excursus 16 trustability Test of Scale for Measurement for Domestic Satisfaction and

Satisfaction with life—————- 311

excursus 17 Number of Persons per Room————– 312

excursus 18 Layouts of Media Village and OGD Housing Estates Asero, Abeokuta———- 313

excursus 19 Categorical star element Analysis of confines of casing Acceptability Evaluation in All the casing Estates( Model Summary)——– 314

excursus 20 Categorical star element Analysis of confines of casing Acceptability

Evaluation in the Core Housing Estates

Excursus 20 Categorical star element Analysis of confines of casing Acceptability

Evaluation in the Core Housing Estates( Model Summary)——– 315

excursus 21 Categorical star element Analysis of confines of casing acceptability

evaluation in the Turnkey casing estates( Model Summary)———— 316

excursus 22 Categorical star element Analysis of confines of casing acceptability

evaluation in the PPP casing estate( Model Summary)—— 317

excursus 23 Categorical star element Analysis of confines of casing acceptability

evaluation in the Shell casing estates( Model Summary)—— 318

excursus 24 Categorical star element Analysis of confines of Domestic

Satisfaction in all the casing estates( Model Summary)——– 319

excursus 25 Categorical star element Analysis of Domestic Satisfaction evaluation in

the Shell casing estates( Model Summary)————– 320

excursus 26 Categorical star element Analysis of confines of Domestic

Satisfaction evaluation in the Turnkey casing estates( Model Summary)——– 321

excursus 27 Categorical star element Analysis of confines of domestic

Satisfaction evaluation in the PPP casing estates( Model Summary)– 322

excursus 28 Categorical star element Analysis of confines of Domestic

Satisfaction evaluation in the Shell casing estates( Model Summary)———- 323

excursus 29 Discriminant Analysis of Satisfaction with Life in jackets Estates– 324

LIST OF TABLES

Table2.1 The Population Distribution across Original Government Areas in Ogun State——– 14

Table2.2 Planned and Completed Housing Units by the OSHC——– 30

Table2.3 Planned and Completed Housing Units by OPIC. ————– 32

Table2.4 Planned and Completed Housing Units by the GCDCL——– 33

Table2.5 Planned and Completed Housing Schemes by the MOH——- 34

Table5.1 Sample Size of Housing Units for Each casing Delivery Strategy———– 93

Table5.2 Distribution of Questionnaires to residers of Housing units according to

casing Delivery Strategies—————— 102

Table6.1 Average Yearly Income of Repliers————- 107

Table6.2 Highest Educational Qualification of Repliers———- 107

Table6.3 Areas of Specialization of Repliers—————- 108

Table6.4 Designation of Repliers——————– 109

Table6.5 Organizational Characteristics—————– 118

Table6.6 Individual Score on Overall Organizational Capacity——– 119

Table6.7 Contributing factors to Overall Organizational Capacity—— 120

Table6.8 Individual Scores on Acceptability of operation Capacity———— 122

Table6.9 Individuals†™ Scores on Acceptability of coffers Capacity———— 122

Table6.10 Contributing Attributes to Organizational Capacity across the Associations—– 125

Table6.11 Acceptability indicators of Organizational Capacity of the four

Associations—————— 127

Table7.1 fresh Conditions in the Housing Units————— 134

Table7.2 casing Typology————– 134

Table7.3 Sizes of Housing Units—————– 135

Table7.4 fresh Spatial Conditions in the casing Units across the Strategies——— 136

Table7.5 Mode of Acquisition of Housing Units—————– 136

Table7.6 Evaluation of Housing Acquisition Process———— 137

Table7.7 Evaluation of Cost of casing—————– 138

Table7.8 Descriptive Statistics of residency rate———– 139

Table7.9 Mode of Water Supply in Housing Units————- 141

Table7.10 Source of Power Supply to Housing Units——— 142

Tables7.11 Refuse Collection and Disposal from Housing Units—— 143

Table7.12 casing Estate Characteristics and installations across the Housing Delivery

Strategies———————– 145

Table8.1 Respondents†™ coitus————– 153

Table8.2 Age Grouping of Repliers—————— 153

Table8.3 Marital Status of Repliers—————— 154

Table8.4 Educational Attainment of Repliers————— 155

Table8.5 Employment Sector of Repliers———- 155

Table8.6 Personal Average Monthly Income of Repliers———- 156

Table8.7 Length of Residency in the Housing Estate———– 157

Table8.8 Type of Tenure—————– 157

Table8.9 Household Sizes of Repliers————– 158

Table9.1 Overall casing Acceptability——————– 162

Table9.2 donation of Housing Attributes to Housing Adequacy——— 163

Table9.3 Acceptability of Housing Unit Attributes—————- 164

Table9.4 Acceptability of Housing Services and structure———– 165

Table9.5 Acceptability of Neighbourhood installations————— 166

Table9.6 Acceptability of operation of installations————— 167

Table9.7 Contributing Attributes to Housing acceptability across the Delivery Strategies——- 170

Table9.8-Sub-Components Acceptability Indices—————— 174

Table9.9 Acceptability Indices HousingSub-components across the different casing Delivery

Strategies———————– 174

Table9.10 Retrogression Portions of Predictors of Overall casing Acceptability——- 178

Table9.11 confines of casing Acceptability Description in all the casing Estates– 180

Table9.12 confines of casing Acceptability Description in the Core Housing Strategy—— 181

Table9.13 confines of casing Acceptability Description in the Turnkey Strategy—- 183

Table9.14 confines of casing Acceptability Description in the PPP Strategy——— 184

Table9.15 confines of casing Acceptability Description in the Shell Strategy——- 186

Table9.16 Summary of Result of Factor Analysis on Housing Adequacy across the Strategies

——————– 188

Table10.1 Overall Domestic Satisfaction in all the casing estates———— 193

Table10.2 donation of Housing Attributes to overall Domestic Satisfaction—– 195

Table10.3 Satisfaction with Housing Unit Attribute————- 196

Table10.4 Satisfaction with Housing Unit Services————- 197

Table10.5 Satisfaction with position of Neighbourhood installations———— 198

Table10.6 Satisfaction with Socio- Economic Environment of Housing Estates——- 199

Table10.7 Satisfaction with operation of Housing Estates——— 200

Table10.8 donation of Housing Attributes to Domestic Satisfaction—– 204

Table10.9 Satisfaction indicators of Housingsub-Components———– 210

Table10.10 Satisfaction indicators across casing Delivery Strategies———– 212

Table10.11 Retrogression Portions of Predictors of Domestic Satisfaction in all the Housing Estates———————— 216

Table10.12 Indispensable Retrogression Portions of Predictors of Domestic Satisfaction in all the casing Estates without casing acceptability as a predictor———— 218

Table10.13 confines of Domestic Satisfaction Description in all the Housing Estates–220

Table10.14 confines of Domestic Satisfaction Description in the Core casing Estates 221

Table10.15 confines of Domestic Satisfaction Description in all Turnkey Housing

Estates—————- 223

Table10.16 confines of Domestic Satisfaction Description in the PPP Housing Estate– 225

Table10.17 confines of Domestic Satisfaction Description in the Shell Housing Estate- 227

Table10.18 Summary of Result of Factor Analysis on Domestic Satisfaction across the

Strategies———————- 229

Table11.1 Retrogression Portions of Predictors of Satisfaction with Life in all the casing

Estate—————— 239

Table11.2 Discriminant Analysis of Satisfaction with life in all the Housing Estates——– 241

Table11.3 Structure Matrix of Discriminant Analysis of Satisfaction with Life——– 242

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure2.1 Chart of Ogun State Showing the Original Government Areas———– 11

Figure3.1 factors of a typical Programme Impact Theory——- 42

Figure3.2 Basic Logic Model————– 42

Figure3.3 Quality Of Life A System Model————- 81

Figure4.1 The Theoretical and Abstract Framework of the study———— 90

Figure6.1 Age Group of Repliers———— 107

Figure6.2 Times of Experience of Repliers———- 110

Figure6.3 Organizational Structure of the Ogun State Housing Corporation———— 111

Figure6.4 Organizational Structure of the Ogun State Property and Investment Company

OPIC) and Gateway City Development Company Limited( GCDCL)——– 112

Figure6.5 Organizational Structure of the Ogun Sate Ministry of Housing—– 113

Figure6.6 Acceptability of Organizational Capacity across the Associations—— 124

Figure7.1 casing Typology———————- 132

Figure7.2 Sizes of Dwelling Units—————- 132

Figure8.1 Age Groups of Repliers——————– 150

Figure8.2 Personal Average Monthly Income( Naira)———– 151

Figure8.3 Household Sizes—————- 152

Figure8.4 term Types——————- 152

Figure9.1 Individual Housing Adequacy Rating across the Delivery Strategies——– 169

Figure10.1 Domestic Satisfaction Across casing Delivery Strategies——- 202

Figure11.1 Residents†™ Satisfaction with Life In public casing——– 234

Figure11.2 Satisfaction with life across the different casing delivery Strategies—– 235

LIST OF Photos

Plat 1 View of the Core Housing Estate—————– 21

Plate 2 View of the Media Village, Abeokuta at Commissioning——- 23

Plate 3 Typical two- bed roomsemi-detached house in the Media Village, Abeokuta———- 23

Plate 4 Three Bed room Bungalow in the Presidential Mandate Housing Scheme constructed

with burnt bricks——————– 24

Plate 5 Typical Detached 3- bed room bungalow in the OGD- Sparklight Estate, Ibafo——— 26

Plate 6 View of unoccupied casing units in the OGD- Sparklight Estate, Ibafo——– 26

Plate 7 View of unoccupied casing units in the OGD- Sparklight Estate, Ibafo——– 27

Plate 8 enthralled casing Units in the OSHC Estate, Ota—————- 28