The Impact Of Agricultural Development On Nigerian Economic Growth

The Impact Of Agricultural Development On Nigerian Economic Growth

Abstract

The term Agricultureâ has been subordinated to different delineations by colorful experts. As a result Ighodo( 1984 20) defined husbandry as the art and wisdom of the civilization of crops and parenting of creatures for man†™ suse. He also emphasized that husbandry is also the product of fibres for diligence, processing of ranch yield, packaging and marketing of ranchproducts. This description is relatively embracing as it covers all conditioning that insure man†™ ssurvival. still, the aspect of exploration and training that’s so vital in product was conspicuously missing in the description.

In order to fill this gap, Ogwuma( 1985 5- 8) defines husbandry as product of field crops, forestry, fishing and beast, exploration and training of extension workers.

product is only complete when it gets to the finalconsumers. It’s in response to this profitable doctrine that Anyanwu( 1987102) defined husbandry as involving civilization of land, raising and rearing of creatures for the purpose of furnishing food for man, feed for creatures and raw accoutrements forindustries. It involves forestry, fishing, processing and marketing of these agrarian products.

Komolafe( 1985), Adegoye( 1985) and Adubi( 2000) defined husbandry as the civilization of soil for crop product and of looking after creatures to produce better meat and other food products and also a process by which ranch products are vended.

Simon Kuznet( 1973) defined profitable growth as a long term rise in the capacity to supply decreasingly different profitable goods to itspopulation. It entails a sustainable rise in public affair which is a incarnation of profitable growth.

To Anyanwu( 1997), the part of husbandry in transubstantiating both the social and profitable frame of an frugality can not beover-emphasized.  In effect, it has been the main source of economic employment from which the nation can feed its bulging population, furnishing the nation†™ s diligence with original raw accoutrements and as a dependable source of government profit.

According to Adegoye and Dittah( 1985), agrarian affair can increase the position of income of growers and thepeople. They said what constitutes the position of agrarian affair will vary with the stage of profitable development of a country.

For a purely subsistence frugality, agrarian development will do but not like in a completely developedeconomy. If there’s enough food for the people and a marketable fat is produced, it’ll increase the income of thepeasants. The raised income generated would so give means for them to buy other musts of life, which they can not producethemselves. By this means, the standard of living of the peasants will ameliorate and severance, underdevelopment will be reduced.

They stated that a completely developed frugality, especially in agrarian sector, means increase in the product of import crops with an enhancement in the volume and grades of similar importcrops. For a country that has started to industrialize, agrarian affair will be said to have acquired growth if husbandry can supply enough raw accoutrements to theagro-allied diligence.

Reynolds( 1975 215), revealed that agrarian development can promote the profitable development by adding the force of food available for domestic consumption and releasing the labour demanded for artificialemployment. According to him, agrarian development can promote profitable development of underdeveloped countries in four distinct ways

i) By adding the force of food available for domestic consumption and releasing labour demanded for artificial employment.

ii) By enlarging the size of the domestic request for the manufacturing sector.

iii) By adding the force of domestic savings and

iv) By furnishing foreign exchange earned by the agrarian exports.

Omawale and Rodriguez( 1975) editorialized that for utmost developing countries, husbandry has been assigned an important part in publicdevelopment. To them, husbandry has been seen as a means of reducing dependence on certain importations, containing food price increases, earning foreign exchange, absorbing numerous new entrants to the labour request and adding ranch inflows at times of severe severance and pastoral poverty.

According toJ.C. Anyanwu,A. Oyefusi,H. Oaikhenan andF.A. Dimowo( 1997), the part of husbandry in transubstantiating both the social and profitable frame of an frugality can not beover-emphasized.  It’s a source of food and raw accoutrements for the artificial sector, it’s also essential for expansion of employment occasion, for reduction of poverty and enhancement of income distribution, also for speeding up industrialization and easing the pressure on Balance of Payment. In effect, it has been the source of economic employment from which the nation can feed its bulging population, furnishing the nation†™ s diligence with original raw accoutrements and as a dependable source of government profit.