Effect Of Gender And Locality On Altruistic Behavior Among Adults

 

ABSTRACT

 

This study looked at the effects of gender and location on altruistic behavior in people. A total of 100 participants were used, including 50 males (25 rural and 25 urban) and 50 females (25 rural and 25 urban). The participants ranged in age from 25 to 55 years old, with a mean age of 41 years. A 15-item questionnaire was employed to assess altruistic behavior. A two-by-two factorial design was used, with two levels of gender as factors; male/female, and two levels of geography as factors; rural/urban areas. As a result, the two-way ANOVA – F Test was used as a statistical test to assess the data. Gender had no effect on altruistic conduct, according to the findings [F (1,96) = 1.13, P>.05]. Locality had a significant influence [F (1,96) = 67.95.01]. Rural residents were found to exhibit higher levels of altruism than urban residents. Gender and location had no interaction effect on altruistic behavior [F (1,96) = 34.92 >.05]. The findings were addressed in respect to the studied literature, and recommendations were given.

 

CHAPITRE ONE

 

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY INTRODUCTION

 

We explored if assisting could be a genetically transmitted evolutionary product. However, rather than destroying the entire human species, perhaps it is better to help wreck families. Some people have a stronger genetically rooted prosperity to maintain than others. One of the fundamental social behavior puzzles is why humans perform actions that maintain civilization.

 

In 1944, a young Swedish diplomat named Raoul Wallenberg was dispatched to Budapest, Hungary, under Nazi instructions. Charlie Chaplin and the Mark brothers were Wallenberg’s heroes as a young man. Wellenberg made the decision to acquire a variety of official-cooking Hungarian documents, such as driver’s licenses and tax receipts, and pass them off to the German as “Swedish” protected “passports.” He dimmed in a classic act of artistic heroism? On top of a moving train transporting hundreds of Jews to concentration camps. He then dashed across the roof, dropping the passport through an air vent.

 

Finally, he directed that the train be stopped and all “Swedish citizens” be released. Raoul finally saved over 100,000 women, men, and children by risky yet imaginative acts (Folgeman 1944 Wellenberg, 1990). Suzu Valadez, the woman who brings food and supplies to individuals living near the mellican rubbish dump, is another example of selflessness. Midlarsky Kahana 1944 defines altruism as “voluntary helpfulness motivated by concern about the responsibility of personal reward.”

 

As a prosocial activity, altruism is defined as voluntary conduct that benefits another person. Comforting, assisting, rescuing, sharing, and cooperating are examples of prosocial behavior (Elsenberg 1992). In general, prosocial youngsters have nurturing and supporting parents who often serve as role models for prosocial conduct Zahn and Smith (1992). Individuals who were active in the civil rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s, for example, were more likely to have parents who had fought tirelessly for social causes in prior decades (Elsenberg 1992). According to Batson (1995), benevolence is frequently driven by selfish interests. People, on the other hand, are sometimes entirely altruistic and, last but not least, selfish. According to Batson (1995), we often aid others because we have empathy, which means that we feel the same grief, suffering, or other emotion that someone else has. For example, you may have empathy for a friend who did not receive the job he wanted.

 

We noted that altruism is frequently driven by selfishness; precisely, we may help others for two key selfish reasons:

 

1. We want to avoid the personal pain of witnessing someone suffer or the shame of failing to assist someone in need.

 

2. We want to experience the delight that someone experiences when his or her life improves.

 

Take note that these justifications represent two types of selfishness: the first attempts to prevent personal misery, while the second seeks personal pleasure. Batson’s key contribution to altruism research is that he has shown how people can be altruistic when their empathy is aroused, even when neither the “avoiding personal pain” nor the “seeking vicarious joy hypothesis” can function.

 

Altruistic persons are more likely to come from households who urge their children to consider how their actions will affect others. This emphasis appears to be conducive to compassion. The parents were also role models for humanitarian behavior. They encourage their children to make friends regardless of social status, race, or religion. As a result, these same children developed into adults who recognized the similarities that unite all humans. They are less prone to emphasize distinctions between “as” and “them.”

 

Finally, it is evident that we can be altruistic for a variety of reasons. We might be altruistic to avoid personal anguish and shame, and we can also be altruistic to experience vicarious delight. However, we can be altruistic when neither of these more selfish reasons apply. Instead, we support others because we have a connection with them. Our empathy has been piqued, and we wish to alleviate their suffering and improve their lives.

 

In light of the foregoing, the researcher wishes to study whether characteristics such as gender and location influence altruistic behavior in adults.

 

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

 

The following are the study’s objectives!

 

To see if gender has a major influence on altruistic behavior in adults.

 

To see if geography has a substantial influence on altruistic behavior in adults.

 

SUMMARY OF THE PROBLEM

 

It often irritates me why we should not be our brothers’ keepers. However, I’ve found that some people find it difficult to help others, while only a handful regard it as a way of life. When I travel to the village, I sense a strong level of love from the residents, which I find difficult to witness in urban settings. This worries me, and there is always the argument that men provide more prosocial assistance than women. The current study was created in order to provide answers to this opinion as well as to determine how much we aid ourselves. When I inquired why individuals found it difficult to aid strangers, accident victims, and so on, it came down to the pick.

 

As a result, the following issues would be addressed in this study.

 

Will gender have a substantial impact on altruistic conduct in adults?

 

  1.         Will adults’ altruistic behavior be influenced by their location?

Leave a Comment