INTRODUCTION

The object of knowledge was described by John Locke. Even though all we ever have of knowledge is ideas in our heads, Locke believed that at least some of these ideas represent real things in the outside world, resulting in an empirical conception of knowing and rejection of innate notions. Locke is assuming that our understanding of the categorical shape attribute comes from our experience with shapes. In this chapter, I shall attempt to characterize and articulate the object of knowledge’s limit, breadth, and extension. Arguments derived from Locke’s model of perception, comprehending perceptual knowledge of things, Lockean arguments for direct realism, and Locke’s theory of ideas argument will be reviewed.

REFERENCE

1. Raymond J. Corsini’s “The Dictionary of Psychology” was published in 2002. p. 219, Psychology Press. Retrieved on the 24th of March 2011.
E.J. Locke on Human Understanding, by E.J. Lowe. Routledge, London, 1995.
John Yolton is number three. The Compass of Human Understanding and John Locke Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1970.

Christopher Fox, number four. The Scriblerians and Locke University of California Press, Berkeley, 1988.

E.J. Locke on Human Understanding, by E.J. Lowe. Routledge, London, 1995.

E.J. Locke on Human Understanding, by E.J. Lowe. Routledge, London, 1995.

John Locke, number seven. An Essay on Humane Understanding is a collection of essays about humane understanding. 1 vols. 1st ed. Thomas Bassett, London, 1690.

8. Rene Descartes, Oeuvres de Descartes (Paris: J. Vrin, 1996), VII.118, edited by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery.

Leave a Comment