Basel /Macro-prudential Tools And Financial System Stability In Nigeria
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the position ofpost-consolidation fiscal stability in Nigeria and the effect of the Basel I Accord perpetration on this stability. Secondary data onpost-consolidation aggregate bank gains and liquidity( measures of fiscal stability) andpost-consolidation aggregate capitalization of banks( made in compliance with Basel I Accord) attained from the Statistical Bulletin, 2014 were analysed using the GARCH model. Research results show that there exists volatility in bank gains( indicating long- term fiscal insecurity), withthe relationship between both variables positive; and there exists no volatility in aggregate bank liquidity indicating the actuality of fiscal system stability( short- term/ liquidity stability) with a significant relationship being between Basel I Accord and the bank liquidity. These findings bear the immediate perpetration of Basel II,II.5 and III with bettered administrative review process, exposures and request disciplines, enhanced minimal capital and liquidity conditions, enhanced administrative process for establishment-wide threat operation and capital operation and capital planning, enhanced threat exposures, request discipline, needed liquidity standard, influence rate and minimal total capital rate to check inordinate threat taking by DMBs, transmit the positive stability in liquidity to stability in gains of DMBs to ameliorate Nigeria’s short- term and long- term fiscal system stability, and shield the system from external shocks andcross-border contagion. Aggregate bank capital, bank connection, Basel I Accord, bank gains, fiscal stability,macro-prudential tools, liquidity.
. Preface
The abdications of the Basel Accord by the G- 10 countries had as its end, the creation of sound fiscal systems in these countries and strengthen the being stability in the transnational fiscal system. The achievement of these pretensions needed the establishment of an indifferent and harmonious transnational banking system. With a sound and stable banking system, banks will be suitable to finance commercial expansions and growth, and foster profitable growth and development. The Basel I Accord determined acceptable capital for banks using the capital acceptability rate of 5 of capital considering the chance of threat- weighted means to guard against banking pitfalls. Hussain et al( 2011) argued that enterprises of possible negative goods of capital scarcities in banks exists as apparent in the G- 10 countries at the perpetration of the Accord with attendant fiscal system regulation.
fiscal system regulation, according to Llewellyn( 1986) is decreasingly accepted as a tool to insure soundness in the system and maintain safety. Research results by Oloyede( 1994) showed that the banking assiduity unlike others, are prone to volatility and fragility from either exogenous or endogenous shocks making the assiduity amenable to regulation and supervision. Ezike and Oke( 2013) editorialized that stability and thickness( as substantiated in the perpetration of the Basel I) is imperative in the banking sector as surveillance and nonsupervisory measures of the Central Bank of Nigeria( CBN), have unfortunately been unfit to keep pace with the velocity of the changes in the fiscal system. On the necessity of regulation in the banking sector, Ogunleye( 2005) noted that regulation is necessary to insure effectiveness, diversity of choice, competition, stability of the fiscal system, macroeconomic stability and development, and the attainment of social objects. Arguments by Mbizi( 2012) supports fiscal system regulation as, according to him, “ they serve as prudential measures that alleviate the goods of profitable extremity on the stability of the banking system and posterior coexisting macroeconomic results; warning that inordinate regulation may increase the cost of intermediation, and reduce profitability of banks, creating insecurity in the banking system. Rhetorically, he questioned “ what marks of regulations are right? ”
From proposition and empirical analysis, Hussain et al( 2011) noted that capital conditions leads to unforeseen compression of bank lending, with negative goods on the frugality, bank inflows and fiscal stability of the fiscal system. This assertion was supported by Naceur and Kandil( 2013). Internationalization and integration of the banking system of lower developed countries to the banking systems of developed countries increased banking pitfalls in less developed countries. incubating, Hussain et al( 2011) argued that debts in less developed countries, growth in out- balance distance conditioning, deregulation of deposit interest rates, rapid-fire technological change and transnational bank competition, eroded capital bases of transnational banks of these countries. Findings by Wagster( 1999) of credit crunch in relation to changes in balance distance accounts and methodical pitfalls of G- 10 countries showed that between 1989 and 19992, banks in the United states, United Kingdom and Canadaexperienced asset redistribution from loans to securities and an increase in methodical threat.
The perpetration of the Basel I Accord, he added, gave a competitive edge to banks to banks in Canada, the United Kingdom and Germany perfecting returns to deposit plutocrat banks( DMBs). The Central Bank of Nigeria introduced the Basel I Accord in 2004 performing in increase in capital base of banks to N25 billion. The exercise reduced the number of banks to 25 with all financially stable and sound with further finances to finance profitable growth( CBN, 2007). How has the preface of the Basel I Accord affected fiscal performances of deposit plutocrat banks( DMBs) and overall fiscal system stability?
Ideal Of The Study
The Basel I Accord has been successfully enforced in Nigeria with prospects as contained in the Accord. This paper aims to determine the effectiveness ofmacro-prudential tools in the Basel I Accord in rooting and maintaining fiscal stability in the Nigerian fiscalsystem.Provision of acceptable capital to forestall illiquidity in the fiscal system and boost bank client confidence needed the bank connection exercise in 2004 in Nigeria. This exercise increased the capital base of each bank to N25 billion. therefore, banks in Nigeria had acceptable capital to cover total credit advanced and sustain liquidity in the banking system.
Defense For This Study
Studies on the impact of Basel I on micro and macroeconomic variables within and across countries are replete in literature. Peek et al( 1995) delved the short- run impact of Basel I on credit. Berger et al( 1994) delved the long- run impact of Basel I on bank credit in the United States. Hassain et al( 2011) tested the impact of the Basel I Accord on credit expansion in developing countries.
Nwidobie( 2014) delved the effect of bank credit and GDP in Nigeria. Studies by Ho and Sasaki( 1998), Kim and Moreno( 1994), Woo( 1999) and Honda( 2002) were on the impact of Basel I Accord on bank credit. Chiuri et al( 2001) concentrated on Basel I and bank credit in 16 arising request husbandry. Barajas et al( 2005) conducted analogous study on the impact on Basel I Accord on credit crunch in Latin America. Aggarwal et al( 2001, 1988) and Jacques et al( 1997) delved the effect of the duty of capital base regulations on banks through the Accord on banks in developed husbandry. Husaain and Hassan( 2004) conducted analogous study on Basel I and risk- taking by DMBs and capital rate. Study on basel I and fiscal stability seems missing challenging this study.
Exploration Suppositions
To determine the effectiveness of themacro-prudential tools in the Basel I Accord on fiscal stability in Nigeria, the following suppositions is tested in this study
· Ho perpetration of themacro-prudential conditions in the Basel I Accord has not bettered aggregate bank profitability( fiscal system stability)
· H0 perpetration of themacro-prudential conditions in the Basel I Accord has not bettered aggregate bank liquidity( fiscal system stability)
Leave a Comment