Compilation Of Bibliography On Abortion In Nigeria (2009-2012)

 

Preface

 

revocation is the junking or explusion of an anbryo or foetus from the uterus, performing or causing its death. This can be spontaneously as confinement or other refections. “ revocation ” can relate to an convinced procedure at any point during mortal gestation. It’s occasionally medically defined as either confinement or convinced termination before the point of variability. Through history, revocation has been convinced by colorful styles and the moral and legal aspects of revocation is subject to violent debate in numerous corridor of the world/ Jones et al. 2004).

 

still, a clearer description of revocation is the junking of a growing embryo or foetus from uterus from which it’s attached. This general description covers spontaneously revocation( Confinement) and convinced revocation but distinguished both from unseasonable birth. Live or still. Golden( 2001) stated that certain authorities feel to complicate the issue by defining revocation as termination, expatriation or detachment of foetus or fertilized ovum before its time of viability. In general a foetus isn’t feasible before the 18thweeks of gravidity. The following medical terms are used to classify revocation.

 

1. robotic revocation( Confinement)-robotic revocation, according to Mules( 2001) is the unforeseen termination or explosion of the foetus/ gestation. It’s characterized by complaints of feeling of uneasiness before the unset of specific signs and symptoms, by the mama similar as vaginal bleeding that is, brown finding or bright red blood. robotic revocation can be due to accidental trauma or natural causes, utmost deliveries are due to uncorrected replication of chromosomes; they can also be caused by environmental factors.

 

2. Induced Abortion This is an revocation brought about by hindrance either by remedial or optional revocation as a result of deliberate mortal action.( Roche, 2004).

 

3. remedial revocation- An revocation performed either

 

a) To save the life of the pregnant women

 

b) To save the woman’s physical or internal health.

 

c) Terminate gestation that would affect in a child born with a natural complaint that would be fatal or association with significant morbidity.

 

d) opting reduce the number of foetus to lessen health pitfalls association with multiple gravidity.

 

In United Kingdom, legal termination of gestation is a remedial procedure carried out under the terms of the 1967 revocation act( United Kingdom Abortion Act, 2011). Before this type of revocation can be carried out 12 registered medical interpreters should be of the opinion that the gestation should be terminated and concurrence must be attained from hubby and woman . The procedure is performed after an agreement must have been reached between the two croakers .

 

4. optional revocation This is an revocation performed at will by an individual in violation of the Abortion Act( United Kingdom Abortion Act, 2011). This type of revocation of performed for any other reason. similar procedures are illegal and punishable by imprisonment especially in country like Nigeria. It’s tried by unqualified,non-expert person ornon-medical( quack) guru. It can also be done by cases herself by ingesting sharp substances similar as taking blece, potash, lime or inordinate swab.

 

The world-wide legal countries of revocation ranges from complete prohibition to optional procedures at the request of the pregnant woman. Olitan( 2010) editorialized that in the environmental enterprises. Social- profitable development and recognition of the right of women to control their own fertility and backed by technological creative. revocation has gradationally surfaced from an air of social ambivalence. still, revocation has continued ranging debates in political, social, medical, theological and legal fields( Christian 1999). To this end, two major camps has remerged videlicet-

 

a) Thepro-choice

 

b) Thepro-life

 

Thepro-choice fights for the legalization of revocation and hence that a woman should have the right to decide whether or not to have her baby whilepro-life activist on the other hand fight for the right of the future child to live and hence are vehemently opposed to the legalization of revocation( Christian 1999).

 

1. Adebala, Benson. 2009. What’s revocation. In Love and Life.P. 10- 20. Ondo; African University Publisher.

 

2. Adebala, Bension – 2010. What’s revocation in Love and Life.P. 10- 30 Ondo; African Publisher.

 

3. Adebenjo, Kamso. 2009. Complications in revocation. The Guardian. 10 June,P. 21.

 

4. Adewole,I.F. 2009. revocation in Nigeria; A major health problem in barring Unsafe revocation in Nigeria. Nigeria Medical Association. Ota.

 

5., et al 2010. Contraceptive operation among revocation campaigners in Nigeria. West African Journal Med. 21( 2)P.112- 114.

 

6. Adinina, JIB. etal. 2010. mindfulness and Practice of post revocation care services among health care professionals in south eastern Nigeria. The south east Asian Journal of Tropical drug and public health.p. 696- 704.

 

7. Adeyemo, Joshua. 2009. revocation is the only option Punch. 15 March.P. 22.

 

8. Agarrtha,J. 2009. revocation; Breaking the culture of silence. Champion. 9. July,P. 34- 37.

 

9. Amadi, John. 2010. Say No to Child tourism. Christian outlook. 4 April,p. 24.

 

10. Asiegbu, Livinus. 2009. Contraceptive without pains daily star. 3 Feb.P. 8.

 

11. Chukwuma, Helen. 2009. Dangerous of revocation. Fides 31Dec.,P. 32.

 

12. Dickson,D.O 2009. How can revocation six month gestation. Hints. July 7,P. 24.

 

13. Edore, Beanly. 2010. ultramodern ways of removing unwanted gestation. Nigeria bystander. 15 March.P. 25.

 

14. Efosa, Joseph. 2009. Ovulation following revocation with a literal and cycological study. Fides 3 Nov.P. 16- 17.

 

15. Emeka, Ike. 2009. Family Planning and Abortion. In catch a man and keep him.P. 80- 90. Benin City Rozine publisher.

 

16. Ezennonna,N.A. 2010. threat involved in revocation. Nigeria Tribune. 17 October,P. 21.

 

17. Gbadi, Fred. 2010 Social and artistic aspect of family planning system. Daily Champion. 1 Sept.P. 17.

 

18. Ikeh, Chidubem. 2009. Development in revocation control. Sunday Concord. 21 Sept.P. 29.

 

19.Inegbenebor.,U. 2012. Abstract Model for the forestallment of maternality in Nigeria. Tropical Croaker. April 27.P. 25- 35.

 

20. James,T. 2010. revocation is dangerous. Vanguard 22 May,P. 44.

 

21. Mbah, Dorath. 2011. Medical Sociology of revocation. The New Watch.Aug. 5P. 61- 68.

 

22. Mbamalu,N.D. 2009. Legalizing revocation. Fides. August 8.P. 18.

 

23. Monode,M.A. 2011. revocation and its effect. In a book on family planning and contraceptive.P. 70- 172.

 

24. Muojekwu, Charles. 2009. revocation is the only option. Punch. 15 Marchp. 22.

 

25. Nath,D.C. 2010. What’s revocation. Nigeria Tribune. 10 Sept.P. 20.

 

26. Nnamdi, Chike. 2010. revocation and Health. In sociology of drug.P. 70- 71.

 

27. Nwadozie, Charles. 2010. Family Planning availability and Practice. The news watch. 31 Jan,P. 34- 35.

 

28. Obazee, Iyobosa. 2009. How youthful ladies can avoid revocation. Punch 29 Aug.P. 34- 35.

 

29. Odusanya, Ronke. 2010. Why women suffer may be complications fromabortion. Punch. 16 June,P. 1- 2.

 

30. Okagbue,O.C. 2009. revocation in Nigeria. Nigeria Medical interpreters, 16.P. 135- 137.

 

31. Okeke, Amechi. 2010. revocation, breaking the culture of silence. Champion. 9 Aug.P. 34- 35.

 

32. Okonofua,F.E. 2009. Unwanted gestation, Unsafe revocation and the Law in Nigeria. Tropical Journal of onstitrics and Gynecology.Vol. 29.P. 515- 517.

 

33. Okosun,B. 2011. There are dangerous in revocation. Health careFeb. 17,P. 18.

 

34. Oludara, Adede. 2011. Ways to help revocation. Punch andFeb.,P. 18- 20.

 

35. Olufalage, Musa. 2011. gestation incontinently abandoned independent. 8Fe.,P. 18- 20.

 

36. Onyekwu. 2012. revocation is killing our health No.vol. 6,P. 16.

 

37. Ossai, Mary. 2009. revocation and Health. Punch.Nov. 16P. 31.

 

38. Paul,C. 2010. revocation among youthful girls. Vanguard. 22 June.P. 19.

 

39. Uche,I.I. 2009. Family Planning and revocation. Nigeria bystander, 20 July,P. 20.

 

40. Ukachukwu, Ndubuisi. 2010. revocation and blankness Health care.Feb.,P. 6- 8.

 

41. Umeh,E. 2010. revocation Bill faces Mounting opposition. Daily Times( 15);P. 6- 9.

 

42. Wolusiwe,J.A. 2011. Question on revocation. Concord 7Jan. 7- 8.

 

Confinement

 

43. Adewole,I.F. 2010. The part of revocation and Confinement in motherly Morality and Morbidity in creation of safe fatherhood at the primary Health care position. Unicef publishers.P. 81- 92.

 

44., revocation in Nigeria. A major health problem in barring unsafe revocation in Nigeria. Proceedings of a consultive meeting Nigeria medical association- ota A 17 Aug.P. 41.

 

45. Adnma, J B etal. 2010. mindfulness and practice of post revocation care services among health care professionals in south eastern Nigeria. The South east AsianI. of Tropical drug and public health.P.696. 704.

 

46. Efosa, Joseph. 2009. Ovulation following robotic revocation with a literal and cyclological study. Fides. 3 Nov.P. 16- 17.

 

Leave a Comment