Design And Implementation Of Project Management System

Design And Implementation Of Project Management System

Abstract

This design is aimed at developing a web- grounded system, which manages the exertion of “ Student Project Management system ”. This system will manage the database and maintain a list of all pupil or groups of pupil that have registered as a finalist in this point, and for those scholars that been shortlisted who have passed the eligibility criteria as set by the speaker/ administrator. The programming Language used is MicrosoftASP.NET. This Language was chosen because of its object acquainted features and class libraries for developing online operations.

Chapter One

Preface

One of the recent advances in the world of information technology is the rapid-fire development of communication which has turned the world into a global vill, we can shoot matters electronically(e-mail), hunt for information( www), buy goods online(e-commerce), withdraw/ transfer plutocrat(e-banking), academy online(e-learning); this has affected the society appreciatively to a great extent, as a result, robotization of design operation shouldn’t be exempted in this revolution.

Project Management( PM) is the discipline of planning, organizing, and managing coffers to bring about the successful completion of a specific design pretensions and objects. A design is a finite bid having a specific launch and completion date, accepted to produce a unique product or service which brings about salutary change or added value. This finite specific of a design stand in sharp discrepancy to processes, or operations, which are endless orsemi-permanent functional workshop to repetitively produce the same product or service. In practice, the operation of these two systems is frequently set up to be relatively different, and as similar requires the development of distinct specialized chops and the relinquishment of separate operation gospel, which is the subject of this study.

The primary challenge of design operation is to achieve all of the design pretensions and objects while clinging to classic design constraints generally compass, quality, time and budget. The secondary and more ambitious challenge is to optimize the allocation and integration of inputs necessary to meetpre-defined objects. A design is a precisely defined set of conditioning that use coffers( plutocrat, people, accoutrements , energy, space, vittles, communication, provocation,etc.) to achieve its pretensions and objects.

design operation is relatively frequently the fiefdom and responsibility of an individual design director. This individual infrequently participates directly in the conditioning that produce the end result, but rather strives to maintain the progress and productive collective commerce of colorful parties in such a way that overall threat of failure is reduced. A design director is frequently a customer representative and has to determine and apply the exact requirements of the customer, grounded on knowledge of the establishment they’re representing. The capability to acclimatize to the colorful internal procedures of the constricting party, and to form close links with the nominated representatives, is essential in icing that the crucial issues of cost, time, quality, and over all, customer satisfaction, can be realized.

Anyhow of the approach employed, careful consideration needs to be given to clarify girding design objects, pretensions, and importantly, the places and liabilities of all actors and stakeholders. In software development, this approach is frequently known as” cascade development”, i.e., one series of tasks after another in direct sequence. In software development numerous associations have acclimated the Rational Unified Process( RUP) to fit this methodology, although RUP doesn’t bear or explicitly recommend this practice. Waterfall development can work for small tightly defined systems, but for larger systems of undetermined or unknowable compass, it’s less suited.

The Cone of query explains some of this as the planning made on the original phase of the design suffers from a high degree of query. This becomes especially true as software development is frequently the consummation of a new or new product, this system has been extensively accepted as ineffective for software systems where conditions are largely unknowable up front and susceptible to change. While the names may differ from assiduity to assiduity, the factual stages generally follow common way to problem working” defining the problem, importing options, choosing a path, perpetration and evaluation.”

BACKGROUND OF STUDY

In numerous tertiary institutions in the country, scholars seek a design in a given field of specialty as part of the upper position of their degree programme. generally, a design can be filled by at most one pupil, however in some cases a design is suitable for further than one pupil to work on contemporaneously. To give scholars commodity of a choice, there should be as wide a range of available systems as possible, and in any case the total number of design places shouldn’t be lower than the total number of scholars. generally a speaker will also offer a range of systems, but doesn’t inescapably anticipate that all will be taken up.

Each pupil has preferences over the available systems that he she finds respectable, whilst a speaker will typically have preferences over the scholars that he she is willing to supervise. There may also be upper bounds on the number of scholars that can be assigned to a particular design, and the number of scholars that a given speaker is willing to supervise. In this paper we consider the ways of allocating pupil design in our colorful institutions.

Statement Of The Problem

It has come extensively honored that homemade storehouse of pupil systems has essential problems. Looking at our University, scholars submit hard clones of systems to their colorful departmental libraries. The disadvantages of this homemade system are as listed below;

1. Possibility of repeating design motifs without discovery by a design administrator

2. Records of design motifs carried out by a pupil are stored in the departmental library for a long time which occupies precious office space

3. systems are prone to loss due to natural disasters similar as fire outbreak.

4. Difficulty in searching for design motifs formerly done

5. systems can not be penetrated outside the University, that is, it has the problem of geographical hedge.

6. Backing up systems becomes a problem since further space will be employed.

Faced with the need to organize systems, the proposed system for operation of pupil systems is unique and completely innovative in its intertwined approach. Its functionality of making design storehouse easier makes it called for. The system to be developed makes use of rich internet technology to replace desktop operation with web operation running on a remote garçon. The system shares the advantage of both web operation and desktop operation, and removes the most disadvantages of both.

Objects Of The Study

The end of this exploration study is to develop a pupil design operation system for this University to effectively manage scholars ’ exploration systems.

The objects of this exploration study are as listed below;

1. To design a database for the system

2. To apply the system using MySQL and PHP

3. To test the pupil design operation system.

Significance Of The Study

The significance of this study is to move from homemade attestation of systems to motorized attestation of systems for easy reclamation, storehouse, delicacy and security. This exploration work will offer the following advantages to the colorful departments in the University of Port Harcourt;

1. Reduced Storage The cost of marketable property and the need to store attestation fore.g. reclamation, nonsupervisory compliance means that paper grounded design storehouse competes with people for space within an organisation. Scanning systems and integrating them into a design operation system can greatly reduce the quantum of high storehouse space needed by paper.

2. Flexible Indexing Indexing paper in further than one way can be done, but it’s awkward, expensive and time- consuming. Images of systems stored within a design operation system can be listed in several different ways contemporaneously.

3. bettered, briskly and more flexible hunt Project Management Systems can recoup lines by any word or expression in the document- known as full textbook hunt- a capability that’s insolvable with paper.

4. Improved Security A design operation system can give better, more flexible control over sensitive systems. numerous design operation system results allow access to systems to be controlled at the brochure and/ or document position for different groups and individualities. Paper systems stored in a traditional form press or form room doesn’t have the same position of security i.e. if you have access to the press you have access to all particulars in it.

5. Disaster Recovery A design operation system provides an easy way to back- over systems for offsite storehouse and disaster recovery furnishing preventive libraries and an effective disaster recovery strategy. Paper is a big and precious way to back- over records and is vulnerable to fire, flood tide, vandalization and theft.

6. No Lost lines Lost systems can be precious and time- consuming to replace. Within a Project Management System, imaged systems remain centrally stored when being viewed, so none are lost or lost. New documents are less likely to be inaptly filed and indeed if inaptly stored can be snappily and fluently set up and moved via the full- textbook searching mechanisms.

7. Digital Archiving Keeping archival performances of systems in a design operation system helps cover paper documents that still have to be retained, from over-handling.

Compass Of The Study

The compass of this design covers scholars ’ Research Project Management in our University. This compass will be achieved in the ensuing areas;

1. Keeping track of exploration systems both approved and completed

2. employing the energy of staff at a faster pace

3. Managing complex changes in an systematized way

4. reacquiring data as at when needed.