The Pitfalls Of Poverty Alleviation Programmes In The Curbing The Incidence Of Poverty In Rural Areas

 

Chapter One

 

Preface

 

Background of the study

 

Poverty is a global miracle that affects mainlands, nations and peoples else. It affects people at different depths and at different situations, at different times and at different stages of their lives. No nation is absolutely without poverty. The main difference is the intensity and frequence of this complaint. Countries insub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and Latin America presently have the loftiest situations of poverty and, accordingly, the smallest socio- profitable development.

 

They also witness the loftiest situations of social instability, violence, screams and a generally inferior standard of living. The Central Bank of Nigeria( 1999 1) considers poverty as” a state in which an existent is unfit to adequately meet his introductory food and apparel requirements. The World Bank( 2000 1) used an inductive approach to uncover colorful confines of poverty similar as well- being, psychology, introductory structure, complaint, and wealth. One of these delineations is” the absence of goods necessary for material well- being, especially foodstuffs, but also casing, land and other goods.

 

In other words, poverty is the lack of multiple coffers leading to hunger and physical privation.” Another description is” the lack of voice, power and independence they exploit. Their poverty makes them vulnerable to rudeness, demotion and inhuman treatment by private and public actors in the state with whom they seek help.” Nigeria, one of the 25 poorest countries in the world, started its own citizenship in 1960 with a poverty rate of just under 15 of its population and is now trying to reduce it by 70 of its population. Current population of 120 million Among those living in poverty, 73 are concentrated in pastoral areas where ignorance is wide, drinking water and health installations are scarce, and road and electrical structure is unapproachable or inadequately managed.

 

Nor is it because the desire of the poor to free themselves from their deplorable and frustrating state of near- despair has not been sufficiently addressed. No Nigerian government, be it military or mercenary, has introduced or abandoned any form of poverty reduction or reduction program aimed at reducing the position of poverty, furnishing stopgap and poor, and to one. Work to produce a kind of substance. Strategies, guidelines and plans have been formulated. Programs and systems have been formulated and enforced over the times. In 1960, at independence, sweats to annihilate poverty in Nigeria concentrated on education, while Operation Feed the Nation( OFN), the Green Revolution, the War on Indiscrimination( WAI) Bank of Nigeria( PBN), Community Banks, Restoration Roads and pastoral structure Directorate( DFFRI), Nigerian Agricultural Land Use Development Agency( NALDA), Support Program Family Farming( FEAP), a program to ameliorate the lives of pastoral women, a Family Support Program( FSP) and a National Poverty Reduction Program( NAPEP) espoused during the reporting period will be examined.

 

Problem statement

 

In Nigeria, we know that all governments follow some form of the poverty reduction strategy. still, the extent to which these programs affected the poor in the target group remained unanswered. Recent studies of poverty and its reduction agencies, as well as programs, show that there’s a significant gap between the thing of reducing or barring poverty and achieving the thing.

 

It seems that the sweats of the colorful governments are ineffective and that, accordingly, little trouble has been made to reap the benefits. Foranti-poverty agencies, their results don’t feel to justify their huge fiscal allocations. The perception of the poor in terms of formal poverty reduction institutions is largely one of inefficiency and impertinence in their lives, as state poverty reduction measures do little to their struggle for survival and infrequently help them out of poverty.

 

Purpose of the study

 

The purpose of this study is to examine the risks of poverty relief programmes in the bridling the prevalence of poverty in pastoral areas. Specifically, the objects are

 

1 To measure the effectiveness of poverty relief programmes in the bridling the prevalence of poverty in pastoral areas;

 

2. To assess their capability for reducing poverty;

 

3 To identify reasons for their failure or success; and

 

5. To suggest and recommend applicable poverty reduction strategies for Nigeria.

 

Significance of the study

 

The study should be a combined trouble to identify, articulate and punctuate the actuality, causes and impact of poverty in Nigeria. It’s about streamlining poverty reduction strategies to make them more effective. The study should also profit a number of groups, including those involved in poverty reduction, similar as policy makers, itineraries, directors, fellow and spectators from poverty and poor agencies, eventually serving from the sweats and indeed the general public.

 

Study thesis

 

The study thesis is

 

thesis 1

 

HO poverty relief programmes aren’t effective in bridling the prevalence of poverty in pastoral areas

 

H1 poverty relief programmes are effective in bridling the prevalence of poverty in pastoral areas

 

thesis 2

 

HO institutional capacity isn’t a significant factor affecting the effectiveness of poverty relief programmes

 

H1 institutional capacity is a significant factor affecting the effectiveness of poverty relief programmes.

 

Compass and Limitations of the Study

 

The study compass is limited to probing the examine the risks of poverty relief programmes in the bridling the prevalence of poverty in pastoral areas in Lagos state. Limitation faced by the exploration was limited time and fiscal constraint

 

Description of Basic languages

 

Absolute Poverty refers to inadequate or total lack of musts and installations like food, casing, medical care, education, social and environmental services, consumer goods, recreational openings, neighbourhood amenities and transport installations,etc.

 

GDP means Gross Domestic Product. This is the Naira value of all the goods and services produced within a country but banning net income from abroad. Globalisation is a process of creating a global request place in which, decreasingly, all nations are forced to share grounded on the following crucial rudiments the connection of autonomous nations through trade and capital overflows, adjustment of the profitable rules that govern connections between these nations; creating structures to support and grease dependence and connection.

 

GNP means Gross National Product. It’s the request value of all the goods and services produced in Nigeria over a specific period of time generally a time at factor cost.

 

Organisation of study

 

The study is grouped into five chapters. This chapter being the first gives an preface to the study. Chapter two gives a review of the affiliated literature. Chapter three presents the exploration methodology; chapter four presents the data analysis as well as interpretation and discussion of the results. Chapter five gives a summary of findings and recommendations.

Leave a Comment